More Problems for the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm and Benefit-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

More Problems for the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm and Benefit

Published:2018-09-26 Issue:4 Volume:22 Page:795-807
ISSN:1386-2820
Container-title:Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Ethic Theory Moral Prac

Author:

Carlson Erik^ORCID

Funder

Riksbankens Jubileumsfond

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-018-9931-5.pdf

Reference10 articles.

1. Bennett J (2001) On forward and backward counterfactual conditionals. In: Preyer G, Siebelt F (eds) Reality and humean supervenience: essays on the philosophy of David Lewis. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp 177–202

2. Bontly TD (2016) Causes, contrasts, and the non-identity problem. Philos Stud 173:1233–1251

3. Bradley B (2012) Doing away with harm. Philos Phenomenol Res 85:390–412

4. Johansson J, Risberg O (2017) The preemption problem. Philos Stud, prepublication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-1019-x

5. Klocksiem J (2012) A defense of the counterfactual comparative account of harm. Am Philos Q 49:285–300

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Defense of Global Theological Voluntarism;Faith and Philosophy;2024

2. Prudential Problems for the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm and Benefit;The Philosophical Quarterly;2023-09-11

3. A Simple Analysis of Harm;Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy;2023-03-31

4. Feit on the normative importance of harm;Theoria;2023-02-07

5. Harm, Failing to Benefit, and the Counterfactual Comparative Account;Utilitas;2022-08-30