Korsgaard’s Other Argument for Interpersonal Morality: the Argument from the Sufficiency of Agency-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Korsgaard’s Other Argument for Interpersonal Morality: the Argument from the Sufficiency of Agency

Published:2018-08 Issue:4 Volume:21 Page:887-902
ISSN:1386-2820
Container-title:Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Ethic Theory Moral Prac

Author:

de Maagt Sem

Funder

Utrecht University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-018-9925-3/fulltext.html

Reference31 articles.

1. Apel K-O (1980) The a priori of the communication community and the foundations of ethics: the problem of a rational foundation of ethics in the scientific age. In: Towards a transformation of philosophy. Marquette University Press, Milwaukee, pp 225–300

2. Beyleveld D (2013) Williams’ false dilemma: how to give categorically binding impartial reasons to real agents. J Moral Philos 10(2):204–226

3. Beyleveld D (2015) Korsgaard v. Gewirth on universalization: why Gewirthians are Kantians and Kantians ought to be Gewirthians. J Moral Philos 12(5):573–597

4. Beyleveld D, Bos G (2009) The foundational role of the principle of instrumental reason in Gewirth’s argument for the principle of generic consistency: a response to Andrew chitty. King's Law J 20(1):1–20

5. Chitty A (2008) Protagonist and subject in Gewirth’s argument for human rights. King's Law J 19(1):1–26

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Razones públicas y normatividad moral;Análisis Filosófico;2023-11-01

2. One Health Requires a Theory of Agency;Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;2022-10

3. Why Humean constructivists should become Kantian constructivists;Philosophical Explorations;2019-05-21