New data on the representation of women in philosophy journals: 2004

New data on the representation of women in philosophy journals: 2004–2015

Published:2017-05-23 Issue:6 Volume:175 Page:1441-1464
ISSN:0031-8116
Container-title:Philosophical Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:Philos Stud

Author:

Wilhelm Isaac,Conklin Sherri Lynn,Hassoun Nicole

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-017-0919-0/fulltext.html

Reference57 articles.

1. Ahmed, S. (2013). Making feminist points. Feministkilljoys: Blog. Available from http://feministkilljoys.com . 20 Jan 2017.

2. Arvan, M. (2015). Philosophers don’t read and cite enough (guest post by Marcus Arvan). Daily Nous: Blog. Available from http://dailynous.com/ . 6 June 2016.

3. Beebee, H., & Saul, J. (2011). Women in philosophy in the UK. A Report by the British Philosophical Association and the Society for Women in Philosophy UK. Joint BPA/SWIP Committee for Women in Philosophy. Available from http://www.bpa.ac.uk . 30 Nov 2015.

4. Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 242–261.

5. Bourget, D., & Chalmers, D. J. (2014). What do philosophers believe? Philosophical Studies, 170(3), 465–500.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Philosophy, Bullshit, and Peer Review;2023-12-12

2. Women in Philosophy: What is to be Done?;European journal of analytic philosophy;2023-04-08

3. Women Philosophers in Communist Socialism;European journal of analytic philosophy;2023-03-19

4. How do philosophers and nonphilosophers think about philosophy? And does personality make a difference?;Synthese;2022-04

5. The View from Below: How the Neoliberal Academy Is Shaping Contemporary Political Theory;Society;2022-04