Abstract
AbstractVeritists hold that only truth has fundamental epistemic value. They are committed to explaining all other instances of epistemic goodness as somehow deriving their value through a relation to truth, and in order to do so they arguably need a non-instrumental relation of epistemic value derivation. As is currently common in epistemology, many veritists assume that the epistemic is an insulated evaluative domain: claims about what has epistemic value are independent of claims about what has value simpliciter. This paper argues that the insulation approach to epistemic value is incompatible with non-instrumental epistemic value derivation. Veritsts who want to avail themselves of this important explanatory resource should therefore abandon the insulation approach.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Ahlström-Vij, K. (2013). In Defense of Veritistic Value Monism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 94(1), 19–40
2. Aschliman, L. K. (2020). Is true belief really a fundamental epistemic value? Episteme, 17(1), 88–104
3. Axtell, G. (1997). Recent Work in Virtue Epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly, 34(1), 1–27
4. Baehr, J. (2006). Character, reliability and virtue epistemology. Philosophical Quarterly, 56(223), 193–212
5. Baehr, J. (2011). The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献