Abstract
AbstractThe concept of a good life is usually assumed by philosophers to be equivalent to that of well-being, or perhaps of a morally good life, and hence has received little attention as a potentially distinct subject matter. In a series of experiments participants were presented with vignettes involving socially sanctioned wrongdoing toward outgroup members. Findings indicated that, for a large majority, judgments of bad character strongly reduce ascriptions of the good life, while having no impact at all on ascriptions of happiness or well-being. Taken together with earlier findings these results suggest that the lay concept of a good life is clearly distinct from those of happiness, well-being, or morality, likely encompassing both morality and well-being, and perhaps other values as well: whatever matters in a person’s life. Importantly, morality appears not to play a fundamental role in either happiness or well-being among the folk.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Alexander, J. (2012). Experimental philosophy: An introduction. Polity.
2. Alexander, J. (2016). Philosophical expertise. A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, 557–567.
3. Alexander, J., & Weinberg, J. M. (2007). Analytic epistemology and experimental philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 2(1), 56–80.
4. Annas, J. (1993). The morality of happiness.
5. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.