A new defense of Tarski's solution to the liar paradox

Author:

Sher GilaORCID

Abstract

AbstractTarski's hierarchical solution to the Liar paradox is widely viewed as ad hoc. In this paper I show that, on the contrary, Tarski's solution is justified by a sound philosophical principle that concerns the inner structure of truth. This principle provides a common philosophical basis to a number of solutions to the Liar paradox, including Tarski's and Kripke's. Tarski himself may not have been aware of this principle, but by providing a philosophical basis to his hierarchical solution to the paradox, it undermines the ad-hocness objection to this solution. Indeed, it contributes to the defense of Tarski's theory against other objections as well.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Reference23 articles.

1. Beall, J. C., Glanzberg, M., & Ripley, D. (2011/16). Liar paradox. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.

2. Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the word. Oxford University Press.

3. Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. O. Kraus (Ed.) (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell & L. L. McAlister, Trans.), 2nd edn. Routledge.

4. Herzberger, H. G. (1970). Paradoxes of grounding in semantics. Journal of Philosophy, 67, 145–167.

5. Kirkham, R. L. (1992). Theories of truth. MIT.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Correspondence pluralism;Synthese;2023-11-15

2. Ordinal type theory;Inquiry;2023-11-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3