Author:
Meacham Christopher J. G.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Arrhenius, G. (2000). An impossibility theorem for welfarist axiologies. Economics and Philosophy, 16, 247–266.
2. Arrhenius, G. (2003). The person-affecting restriction, comparativism, and the moral status of potential people. Ethical Perspectives, 10, 185–195.
3. Arrhenius, G. (2004). The paradoxes of future generations and normative theory. In J. Ryberg, & T. Tännsjö (Eds.), The repugnant conclusion: Essays on population ethics (pp. 201–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
4. Arrhenius, G., Ryberg, J., & Tännsjö, T. (2010). The repugnant conclusion. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/repugnant-conclusion .
5. Blackorby, C., & Donaldson D. (1991). Normative population theory: A comment. Social Choice and Welfare, 8, 261–267.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Dissolution of the Repugnant Conclusion;Journal of Applied Philosophy;2023-07-14
2. The Interpersonal Comparative View of Welfare: Its Merits and Flaws;The Journal of Ethics;2023-06-12
3. Multiverse Rebirth;Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion;2022-12-01
4. Circumventing the Non-identity Problem;Philosophia;2022-11-23
5. The Asymmetry, Uncertainty, and the Long Term;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2022-11-14