Frankfurt cases and the (in)significance of timing: a defense of the buffering strategy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Frankfurt cases and the (in)significance of timing: a defense of the buffering strategy

Published:2012-03-02 Issue:3 Volume:164 Page:599-622
ISSN:0031-8116
Container-title:Philosophical Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:Philos Stud

Author:

Hunt David,Shabo Seth

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11098-012-9874-y.pdf

Reference23 articles.

1. Blumenfeld, D. (1971). The principle of alternative possibilities. Journal of Philosophy, 68, 339–345.

2. Fischer, J. M. (1994). The metaphysics of free will: An essay on control. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

3. Frankfurt, H. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy, 66, 829–839.

4. Franklin, C. E. (2011). Neo-Frankfurtians and buffer cases: The new challenge to the principle of alternative possibilities. Philosophical Studies, 152, 189–207.

5. Ginet, C. (1996). In defense of the principle of alternative possibilities: Why I don’t find Frankfurt’s arguments convincing. Philosophical Perspectives, 10, 403–417.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Foreknowledge requires determinism;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2022-07-27

2. Against (modified) buffer cases;Philosophical Studies;2021-06-19

3. Freedom, Gratitude, and Resentment: Olivi and Strawson;Res Philosophica;2019

4. When is an alternative possibility robust?;European Journal of Philosophy;2018-07-02

5. Alternate Possibilities and Moral Asymmetry;Acta Analytica;2017-08-26