A Multi-Institutional Validation of Gleason Score Derived from Tissue Microarray Cores-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Multi-Institutional Validation of Gleason Score Derived from Tissue Microarray Cores

Published:2018-04-06 Issue:3 Volume:25 Page:979-986
ISSN:1219-4956
Container-title:Pathology & Oncology Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Pathol. Oncol. Res.

Author:

Leyh-Bannurah Sami-Ramzi,Trudel Dominique,Latour Mathieu,Zaffuto Emanuele,Grosset Andree-Anne,Tam Christine,Ouellet Veronique,Graefen Markus,Budäus Lars,Aprikian Armen G.,Lacombe Louis,Fleshner Neil E.,Gleave Martin E.,Mes-Masson Anne-Marie,Saad Fred,Karakiewicz Pierre I

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12253-018-0408-6.pdf

Reference33 articles.

1. Santoni M, Scarpelli M, Mazzucchelli R, Lopez-Beltran A, Cheng L, Epstein JI, Cascinu S, Briganti A, Catto JW, Montorsi F, Montironi R (2016) Current Histopathologic and molecular Characterisations of prostate Cancer: towards individualised prognosis and therapies. European Urology 69(2):186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.041

2. Wittschieber D, Kollermann J, Schlomm T, Sauter G, Erbersdobler A (2010) Nuclear grading versus Gleason grading in small samples containing prostate cancer: a tissue microarray study. Pathology oncology research: POR 16(4):479–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-010-9270-x

3. Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Vickers AJ, Parwani AV, Reuter VE, Fine SW, Eastham JA, Wiklund P, Han M, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP, Nyberg T, Klein EA (2016) A contemporary prostate Cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. European Urology 69(3):428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046

4. Loeb S, Folkvaljon Y, Robinson D, Lissbrant IF, Egevad L, Stattin P (2015) Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason grade groups in a Nationwide population-based cohort. European Urology 69:1135–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.036

5. Sauter G, Steurer S, Clauditz TS, Krech T, Wittmer C, Lutz F, Lennartz M, Janssen T, Hakimi N, Simon R, von Petersdorff-Campen M, Jacobsen F, von Loga K, Wilczak W, Minner S, Tsourlakis MC, Chirico V, Haese A, Heinzer H, Beyer B, Graefen M, Michl U, Salomon G, Steuber T, Budaus LH, Hekeler E, Malsy-Mink J, Kutzera S, Fraune C, Gobel C, Huland H, Schlomm T (2016) Clinical utility of quantitative Gleason grading in prostate biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. European Urology 69(4):592–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.029

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Artificial intelligence unravels interpretable malignancy grades of prostate cancer on histology images;npj Imaging;2024-03-06

2. Artificial Intelligence Helps to Predict Recurrence and Mortality for Prostate Cancer Using Histology Images;2023-07-31

3. Validation of the prognostic value of NF-κB p65 in prostate cancer: A retrospective study using a large multi-institutional cohort of the Canadian Prostate Cancer Biomarker Network;PLOS Medicine;2019-07-02

4. The Terry Fox Research Institute Canadian Prostate Cancer Biomarker Network: an analysis of a pan-Canadian multi-center cohort for biomarker validation;BMC Urology;2018-09-10