Education in Ecological Engineering—a Need Whose Time Has Come

Author:

Dale GlennORCID,Dotro Gabriela,Srivastava Puneet,Austin David,Hutchinson Stacy,Head Peter,Goonetilleke Ashantha,Stefanakis Alexandros,Junge Ranka,Fernández L. José A.,Weyer Vanessa,Truter Wayne,Bühler Devi,Bennett John,Liu Hongbo,Li Zifu,Du Jianqiang,Schneider Petra,Hack Jochen,Schönborn Andreas

Abstract

Abstract Overcoming Limitations of Ecology and Engineering in Addressing Society’s Challenges By providing an integrated, systems-approach to problem-solving that incorporates ecological principles in engineering design, ecological engineering addresses, many of the limitations of Ecology and Engineering needed to work out how people and nature can beneficially coexist on planet Earth. Despite its origins in the 1950s, ecological engineering remains a niche discipline, while at the same time, there has never been a greater need to combine the rigour of engineering and science with the systems-approach of ecology for pro-active management of Earth’s biodiversity and environmental life-support systems. Broad consensus on the scope and defining elements of ecological engineering and development of a globally consistent ecological engineering curriculum are key pillars to mainstream recognition of the discipline and practice of ecological engineering. The Importance of Ecological Engineering in Society In this paper, the importance of ecological engineering education is discussed in relation to the perceived need of our society to address global challenges of sustainable development. The perceived needs of industry, practitioners, educators and students for skills in ecological engineering are also discussed. The Importance and Need for Ecological Engineering Education The need for integrative, interdisciplinary education is discussed in relation to the scope of ecology, engineering and the unique role of ecological engineering. Scope for a Universally Recognised Curriculum in Ecological Engineering The scope for a universally recognised curriculum in ecological engineering is presented. The curriculum recognises a set of overarching principles and concepts that unite multiple application areas of ecological engineering practice. The integrative, systems-based approach of ecological engineering distinguishes it from the trend toward narrow specialisation in education. It is argued that the systems approach to conceptualising problems of design incorporating ecological principles is a central tenant of ecological engineering practice. Challenges to Wider Adoption of Ecological Engineering and Opportunities to Increase Adoption Challenges and structural barriers to wider adoption of ecological engineering principles, embedded in our society’s reliance on technological solutions to environmental problems, are discussed along with opportunities to increase adoption of ecological engineering practice. It is suggested that unifying the numerous specialist activity areas and applications of ecological engineering under an umbrella encompassing a set of core principles, approaches, tools and way of thinking is required to distinguish ecological engineering from other engineering disciplines and scale up implementation of the discipline. It is concluded that these challenges can only be realised if ecological engineering moves beyond application by a relatively small band of enthusiastic practitioners, learning by doing, to the education of future cohorts of students who will become tomorrow’s engineers, project managers, procurement officers and decision makers, applying principles informed by a growing body of theory and knowledge generated by an active research community, a need whose time has come, if we are to deploy all tools at our disposal toward addressing the grand challenge of creating a sustainable future.

Funder

ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference131 articles.

1. Barrett GW, Peles JD, Odum EP (1997) Transcending processes and the levels-of-organisation concept. Bioscience 47(8):531–535

2. Clark SG, Wallace R (2015) Integration and interdisciplinarity: concepts, frameworks, and education. Policy Sci 23(8):233–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9210-4

3. Biermann F, Campe S, Jacob K (2004) Knowledge for the sustainability transition and the challenge for social science – an introduction. In: Proceedings of the 2002 berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change “Knowledge for the Sustainability Transition. The Challenge for Social Science”. Global Governance Project, Amsterdam, Berlin, Potsdam and Oldenburg. isbn:3-00-014956-2

4. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2020) The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York, p 2020, 412pp. isbn:978-92-1-126442-5

5. IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) (2019) In: Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT (eds) Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science- Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. https://ipbes.net/global-assessment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3