Standards of Conducts for Biostatisticians and Stem Cell Researchers: A Call for Self-formulated Aspirational Ethics Over Built-in Prohibitive Ethics

Author:

Sato KeikoORCID,Suzuki MikaORCID

Abstract

AbstractWe proposed the Standards of Conducts to provide a general framework that will serve as the basis for guiding each biostatistician and stem cell researcher to formulate their personal standards, rather than as rules with which they are required to comply. Given the responsibility and characteristics of their work, they are expected to maintain independence and work autonomously as professionals. Each of the Standards of Conducts comprises a preamble, mission and values to uphold, Standards of Conducts (10 items), and background. When one internalizes “self-formulated” standards, to make excuses for oneself would be akin to a self-betrayal; responsible actions can be anticipated. If one begins and continues to consider “who I am and what do I work for,” this will become their inner energy, and a source of motivation and pride to inspire oneself. In addition, this aspirational style might help citizens to recognize the autonomous stance of the professional body and that they share the same values.

Funder

JSPS KAKENHI

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Reference40 articles.

1. American Statistical Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for statistical practice. Retrieved December 8, 2021, from https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/EthicalGuidelines.pdf

2. Aristotle. (2014). Nikomakosu rinrigaku (Nicomachean ethics). (translation Kanzaki, S). Iwanami Shoten.

3. Collins, F. S., & Gottlieb, S. (2018). The next phase of human gene-therapy oversight. New England Journal of Medicine, 379(15), 1393–1395. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1810628

4. Davis, M. (1991). Thinking like an engineer: The place of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20(2), 150–167.

5. Deci, E. L., & Flaste. R. (1999). Hito o nobasu chikara : naihatsu to jiritsu no susume (Why We Do What We Do: The Dynamics of Personal Autonomy). (translation Sakurai, S.) Shin’yosha.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3