“Broader Impacts” or “Responsible Research and Innovation”? A Comparison of Two Criteria for Funding Research in Science and Engineering-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

“Broader Impacts” or “Responsible Research and Innovation”? A Comparison of Two Criteria for Funding Research in Science and Engineering

Published:2013-10-24 Issue:4 Volume:20 Page:963-983
ISSN:1353-3452
Container-title:Science and Engineering Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci Eng Ethics

Author:

Davis Michael,Laas Kelly

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11948-013-9480-1.pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. Anderson, I. (2011), “The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: Bureaucracy versus business in international development” discussion paper 2, Development Policy Center, Crawford School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University, Canberra.

2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012) Improving our work with grantees: A progress report. (September) http://www.gatesfoundation.org/~/media/GFO/Documents/How%20We%20Work/granteeprogressreport2012.pdf . Accessed May 6, 2013.

3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2013) What we do: Agricultural development strategy overview. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/Global-Development/Agricultural-Development . Accessed May 6, 2013.

4. Bruggen, W. W. (2009). Implementation of the national science foundation's ‘broader impacts’: Efficiency considerations and alternative approaches. Social Epistemology, 23(3–4), 234.

5. Butler, D. (2009). “Crossing the valley of death.” Nature, 453, 840–841.

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Inclusion as a science, technology, and innovation policy objective in high-income countries: the decoupling dilemma;Science and Public Policy;2024-05-07

2. The micro-dynamics of scientific choice: research project motivations among public affairs academics;Science and Public Policy;2023-10-12

3. From intent to impact—The decline of broader impacts throughout an NSF project life cycle;Research Evaluation;2023-01-05

4. Responsible impact and the reinforcement of responsible innovation in the public sector ecosystem: cases of digital health innovation;Journal of Responsible Innovation;2023-01-02

5. Democratic Experimentation with Responsibility: A Pragmatist Approach to Responsible Research and Innovation;Putting Responsible Research and Innovation into Practice;2022-10-14