Abstract
AbstractEthical, legal and social implications are widely regarded as important considerations with respect to technological developments. Agile Worth-Oriented Systems Engineering (AWOSE) is an innovative approach to incorporating ethically relevant criteria during agile development processes through a flexibly applicable methodology. First, a predefined model for the ethical evaluation of socio-technical systems is used to assess ethical issues according to different dimensions. The second part of AWOSE ensures that ethical issues are not only identified, but also systematically considered during the design of systems based on information and communication technology. For this purpose, the findings from the first step are integrated with approaches from worth-centered development into a process model that, unlike previous approaches to ethical system development, is thoroughly compatible with agile methodologies like Scrum or Extreme Programming. Artifacts of worth-centered development called Worth Maps have been improved to guide the prioritization of development tasks as well as choices among design alternatives with respect to ethical implications. Furthermore, the improved Worth Maps facilitate the identification of suitable criteria for system evaluations in association to ethical concerns and desired positive outcomes of system usage. The potential of the AWOSE methodology has been demonstrated in the context of a technical system (smart glasses for cognitive assistance) that supports elderly and people with particular handicaps.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
German Research Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)
Reference70 articles.
1. Alkhatib, O. J., & Abdou, A. (2017). An ethical (descriptive) framework for judgment of actions and decisions in the construction industry and engineering—Part I. Science and Engineering Ethics,24(2), 585–606.
2. Bairaktarova, D., & Woodcock, A. (2017). Engineering student’s ethical awareness and behavior: A new motivational model. Science and Engineering Ethics,23(4), 1129–1157.
3. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2006). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Beauregard, R., & Corriveau, P. (2007). User experience quality: A conceptual framework for goal setting and measurement. In International conference on digital human modeling (pp. 325–332). Springer, New York.
5. Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献