Biobanks and Individual Health Related Findings: from an Obstacle to an Incentive

Author:

Lekstutiene JurateORCID,Holm Søren,Gefenas Eugenijus

Abstract

AbstractDespite the benefits biobanks are expected to bring, there have recently been concerns raised that the public and private non-profit biobanks still prevailing in Europe often fail to reach their initial objectives due to a variety of reasons, including a shortage of funding and insufficient utilization of collections. The necessity to find new ways to manage biobanks has been clearly recognized and one way to do this is to follow the success of some commercial direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) companies in the biobanking field. This paper is focused on a double role the return of individual health related findings (IHRF) detected through the biobanking activities can play in the management of biobanks. These findings can be seen as an untapped opportunity to offer health related information to biobank participants. At the same time, the IHRF policy can also serve as an additional tool that can improve biobanking governance. This paper aims to consider diverse IHRF approaches as well as to explore some key ethical concerns related to them. In particular, it reveals how different accounts of personal autonomy shape consent policies related to IHRF and emphasizes ethical controversies related to the commercial DTC GT initiatives as well as some non-profit biobanks.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Reference55 articles.

1. 23andMe. (2020a). Terms of Service. https://www.23andme.com/en-int/about/tos/. Accessed 22 February 2021.

2. 23andMe. (2020b). 23andMe Research Innovation Collaborations Program. https://research.23andme.com/research-innovation-collaborations/. Accessed 22 February 2021.

3. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). (2014). ACMG Updates Recommendation on “Opt Out” for Genome Sequencing Return of Results. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/acmg-updates-recommendation-on-opt-out-for-genome-sequencing-return-of-results-253369641.html. Accessed 22 February 2021.

4. All of Us. (2021). National Research Program Returns First Results to Local Participants. https://allofus.nih.gov/news-events-and-media/news/national-research-program-returns-first-results-local-participants. Accessed 22 February 2021.

5. Allen, N. L., Karlson, E. W., Malspeis, S., Lu, B., Seidman, C. E., & Lehmann, L. S. (2014). Biobank participants’ preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: Perspectives from the ourgenes, ourhealth. OurCommunity Project. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 89(6), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.03.015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3