Abstract
AbstractBiobased production has been promoted as a sustainable alternative to fossil resources. However, controversies over its impact on sustainability highlight societal concerns, value tensions and uncertainties that have not been taken into account during its development. In this work, the consideration of stakeholders’ values in a biorefinery design project is investigated. Value sensitive design (VSD) is a promising approach to the design of technologies with consideration of stakeholders’ values, however, it is not directly applicable for complex systems like biorefineries. Therefore, some elements of VSD, such as the identification of relevant values and their connection to a technology’s features, are brought into biorefinery design practice. Midstream modulation (MM), an approach to promoting the consideration of societal aspects during research and development activities, is applied to promote reflection and value considerations during the design decision making. As result, it is shown that MM interventions during the design process led to new design alternatives in support of stakeholders' values, and allowed to recognize and respond to emerging value tensions within the scope of the project. In this way, the present work shows a novel approach for the technical investigation of VSD, especially for biorefineries. Also, based on this work it is argued that not only reflection, but also flexibility and openness are important for the application of VSD in the context of biorefinery design.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference40 articles.
1. Asveld, L., & Stemerding, D. (2018). Social learning in the bioeconomy, the ecover case. In I. van de Poel, A. Lotte, & D. C. Mehos (Eds.), New perspectives on technology in society: Experimentation beyond the laboratory. Abingdon: Routledge.
2. Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2014). Sustainable chemical engineering: Dealing with “wicked” sustainability problems. AIChE Journal, 60(12), 3998–4007. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14650.
3. Bauer, F., Coenen, L., Hansen, T., McCormick, K., & Palgan, Y. V. (2017). Technological innovation systems for biorefineries: A review of the literature. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 11(3), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1767.
4. Borning, A., Friedman, B., Davis, J., & Lin, P. (2005). Informing public deliberation: Value sensitive design of indicators for a large-scale urban simulation. In H. Gellersen, K. Schmidt, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, & W. Mackay (Eds.), ECSCW 2005 (pp. 449–468). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
5. Borning, A., & Muller, M. (2012). Next steps for value sensitive design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1125–1134). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208560.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献