Raising Suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting Misconduct-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Raising Suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting Misconduct

Published:2010-09-15 Issue:4 Volume:16 Page:697-704
ISSN:1353-3452
Container-title:Science and Engineering Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci Eng Ethics

Author:

Hamrell Michael R.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11948-010-9232-4.pdf

Reference12 articles.

1. Beecher, H. (1966). Ethics and clinical research. The New England Journal of Medicine, 274, 1354–1360.

2. Eichenwald & Kolata (1999, May 17). A doctor’s drug studies turn into fraud. New York Times, p. 1.

3. Federal Register. (2000). Federal research misconduct policy. Federal Register, 65(235), 76260–76264.

4. Federal register. (2006). Case Summary—Paul H. Kornak. Federal Register, 71(37), 9555–9556.

5. Food and Drug Administration (2010). Good clinical practice in FDA-regulated clinical trials. http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RunningClinicalTrials/default.htm . Accessed 20 Aug 2010.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A comprehensive systematic review and bibliometric analysis of food fraud from a global perspective;Journal of Agriculture and Food Research;2023-12

2. So You Want to Be a Principal Investigator;Journal of Oncology Practice;2018-06

3. Good Clinical Practice Training: Identifying Key Elements and Strategies for Increasing Training Efficiency;Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science;2016-07

4. Detecting Data Quality Issues in Clinical Trials: Current Practices and Recommendations;Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science;2016-01

5. Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review;World Journal of Critical Care Medicine;2016