Author:
Lad Pramod M.,Dahl Rebecca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference23 articles.
1. Bankert, E., & Amdur, R. (2009). Informed conset feeback tool. In Institutional review board (2nd ed., Chapter 6–12, pp. 246–248). London, UK: Jones and Bartlett.
2. Barrett, R. (2005). Quality of informed consent: Measuring understanding among participants in oncology clinical trials. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32, 751–755.
3. Brehaut, J., Saginur, R., & Elwyn, G. (2009). Informed consent documentation: Necessary but not sufficient. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 30, 388–389.
4. Clark, S., Mangram, A., & Erenst, D. (2011). A study of the efficacy of informed consents and the associated role of language barriers. Journal of Surgical Education, 68, 143–147.
5. Cohn, E., Jia, H., & Erwin, K. (2011). Measuring the process and quality of De informed consent for clinical research development and testing. Oncology Nursing Forum, 38, 417–422.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献