Abstract
AbstractAlthough big-data research has met with multiple controversies in diverse fields, political and security implications of big data in life sciences have received less attention. This paper explores how threats and risks are anticipated and acted on in biobanking, which builds research repositories for biomedical samples and data. Focusing on the biggest harmonisation cluster of biomedical research in Europe, BBMRI-ERIC, the paper analyses different logics of risk in the anticipatory discourse on biobanking. Based on document analysis, interviews with ELSI experts, and field research, three types of framing of risk are reconstructed: data security, privacy, and data misuse. The paper finds that these logics downplay the broader social and political context and reflects on the limits of the practices of anticipatory governance in biobanking. It argues that this regime of governance can make it difficult for biobanks to address possible future challenges, such as access to biomedical data by authorities, pressures for integrating biobank data with other type of personal data, or their use for profiling beyond medical purposes. To address potential controversies and societal implications related to the use of big data in health research and medicine, the paper suggests to expand the vocabulary and practices of anticipatory governance, in the biobanking community and beyond.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)
Reference57 articles.
1. AAAS. (2014). National and transnational security implications of big data in the life sciences. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
2. Aarden, E. (2017). Projecting and producing ‘usefulness’ of biomedical research infrastructures; or why the Singapore Tissue Network closed. Science and Public Policy, 44(6), 753–762.
3. Anderson, B. (2010). Security and the future: Anticipating the event of terror. Geoforum, 41(2), 227–235.
4. Aradau, C., Huysmans, J., Neal, A., & Voelkner, N. (2014). Introducing critical security methods. In C. Aradau, J. Huysmans, A. Neal, & N. Voelkner (Eds.), Critical security methods: New frameworks for analysis. (pp. 1–22). Routledge.
5. Aykut, S. C., Demortain, D., & Benbouzid, B. (2019). The politics of anticipatory expertise: Plurality and contestation of futures knowledge in governance—Introduction to the special issue. Science & Technology Studies, 32(4), 2–12.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献