Value Change, Value Conflict, and Policy Innovation: Understanding the Opposition to the Market-Based Economic Dispatch of Electricity Scheme in India Using the Multiple Streams Framework

Author:

Goyal NihitORCID,Iychettira Kaveri

Abstract

AbstractAs policy innovation is essential for upscaling responsible innovation, understanding its relationship to value change(s) occurring or sought in sociotechnical systems is imperative. In this study, we ask: what are the different types of values in the policy process? And, how does value change influence policy innovation? We propose a disaggregation of values and value change based on a four-stream variant of the multiple streams framework (MSF), a conceptual lens increasingly used for explaining policy innovation in sociotechnical transitions. Specifically, we posit that the values that ‘govern’ problem framing, policy design, political decision making, and technological diffusion can evolve relatively independently, potentially leading to value conflict. We apply this framework to the ongoing case of the market-based economic dispatch of electricity (MBED) policy in the Indian energy transition using content analysis. We find that the MBED scheme—with its emphasis on efficiency (problem), economic principles (policy), low-cost dispatch (technology), and centralization (politics)—attempts value change in each stream. Each instance of value change is, however, widely contested, with the ensuing value conflicts resulting in significant opposition to this policy innovation. We conclude that a disaggregation of values based on the MSF can facilitate an analysis of value change and value conflict in sociotechnical transitions and lay the foundation for systematically studying the relationships among technological change, value change, and policy change.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Reference140 articles.

1. Abramson, P. R., Ellis, S., & Inglehart, R. (1997). Research in context: Measuring value change. Political Behavior, 19(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024845706077

2. Adani Power (2019). Comments on cerc discussion paper on market based economic dispatch of electricity: Re-designing of day-ahead market (dam) in India. Retrieved from http://www.cercind.gov.in/2019/Comments-MBED/16.%20Adani_Comments_CERC%20MBED.pdf

3. App (2019). Comments on cerc discussion paper on market based economic dispatch of electricity: Re-designing of day-ahead market (dam) in India. Retrieved from http://www.cercind.gov.in/2019/Comments-MBED/12.%20APP%20Comments%20on%20MBED.pdf

4. Bache, I., & Reardon, L. (2013). An idea whose time has come? Explaining the rise of well-being in British politics. Political Studies, 61(4), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12001

5. Baker, A. (2013). The new political economy of the macroprudential ideational shift. New Political Economy, 18(1), 112–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2012.662952

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3