Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review

Author:

Ščepanović ReaORCID,Labib KrishmaORCID,Buljan IvanORCID,Tijdink JoeriORCID,Marušić AnaORCID

Abstract

AbstractResearch integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n = 117) and medical sciences (n = 78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n = 136) and targeted researchers (n = 167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.

Funder

H2020 Science with and for Society

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Reference45 articles.

1. All European Academies (ALLEA). (2017). European code of conduct for research integrity. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/. Accessed 17 June 2020.

2. Aubert Bonn, N., Godecharle, S., & Dierickx, K. (2017). European Universities’ guidance on research integrity and misconduct. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics : JERHRE, 12(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616688980.

3. Begley, C. G., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2015). Reproducibility in science: Improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circulation Research, 116(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819.

4. Boeheme, O., Foeger, N., Hiney, M., Peatfield, T., & Petiet, F. (2016). Research integrity practices in science Europe member organisations. Science Europe: Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity. https://www.scienceeurope.org/our-resources/research-integrity-practices-in-science-europe-member-organisations/. Accessed 15 June 2020.

5. Bouter, L. (2016). What funding agencies can do to prevent sloppy science. http://www.euroscientist.com/what-fundingagencies-and-journals-can-do-to-prevent-sloppy-science/. Accessed 30 September 2020.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3