Ethical and Social Aspects of Neurorobotics

Author:

Aicardi Christine,Akintoye Simisola,Fothergill B. Tyr,Guerrero Manuel,Klinker Gudrun,Knight William,Klüver Lars,Morel Yannick,Morin Fabrice O.,Stahl Bernd Carsten,Ulnicane IngaORCID

Abstract

Abstract The interdisciplinary field of neurorobotics looks to neuroscience to overcome the limitations of modern robotics technology, to robotics to advance our understanding of the neural system’s inner workings, and to information technology to develop tools that support those complementary endeavours. The development of these technologies is still at an early stage, which makes them an ideal candidate for proactive and anticipatory ethical reflection. This article explains the current state of neurorobotics development within the Human Brain Project, originating from a close collaboration between the scientific and technical experts who drive neurorobotics innovation, and the humanities and social sciences scholars who provide contextualising and reflective capabilities. This article discusses some of the ethical issues which can reasonably be expected. On this basis, the article explores possible gaps identified within this collaborative, ethical reflection that calls for attention to ensure that the development of neurorobotics is ethically sound and socially acceptable and desirable.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Reference46 articles.

1. Aicardi, C., Fothergill, B. T., Rainey, S., Stahl, B. C., & Harris, E. (2018). Accompanying technology development in the Human Brain Project: From foresight to ethics management. Futures, 102, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.01.005 .

2. Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., Dautenhahn, K., Edwards, L., Kember, S., et.al. (2011). Principles of robotics. The United Kingdom’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). Retrieved August 20, 2019 from https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics/ .

3. Brooks, R. (2002). Flesh and machines: How robots will change us. New York: Pantheon Books.

4. Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 .

5. Commission, European. (2013). Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Luxembourg: EUR-OP.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3