Abstract
AbstractThis study investigated people’s ethical concerns of surveillance technology. By adopting the spectrum of technological utopian and dystopian narratives, how people perceive a society constructed through the compulsory use of surveillance technology was explored. This study empirically examined the anonymous online expression of attitudes toward the society-wide, compulsory adoption of a contact tracing app that affected almost every aspect of all people’s everyday lives at a societal level. By applying the structural topic modeling approach to analyze comments on four Hong Kong anonymous discussion forums, topics concerning the technological utopian, dystopian, and pragmatic views on the surveillance app were discovered. The findings showed that people with a technological utopian view on this app believed that the implementation of compulsory app use can facilitate social good and maintain social order. In contrast, individuals who had a technological dystopian view expressed privacy concerns and distrust of this surveillance technology. Techno-pragmatists took a balanced approach and evaluated its implementation practically.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Bacon, F. (1627). New Atlantis.
2. Baik, J., & Jang, E. (2022). Where horizontal and vertical surveillances meet: Sense-making of US COVID-19 contact-tracing apps during a health crisis. Mobile Media & Communication, 10, 468–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/205015792210786744
3. Ball, K. (2009). Exposure: Exploring the subject of surveillance. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802270386
4. Bauman, Z. (1976). Socialism: The active utopia. Routledge Revivals.
5. Bentham, J. (1791). Panopticon: Or, the inspection-house. Containing the idea of a new principle of construction applicable to any sort of establishment, in which persons of any description are to be kept under inspection. Thomas Byrne.