Abstract
AbstractData science skills are rapidly becoming a necessity in modern science. In response to this need, institutions and organizations around the world are developing research data science curricula to teach the programming and computational skills that are needed to build and maintain data infrastructures and maximize the use of available data. To date, however, few of these courses have included an explicit ethics component, and developing such components can be challenging. This paper describes a novel approach to teaching data ethics on short courses developed for the CODATA-RDA Schools for Research Data Science. The ethics content of these schools is centred on the concept of open and responsible (data) science citizenship that draws on virtue ethics to promote ethics of practice. Despite having little formal teaching time, this concept of citizenship is made central to the course by distributing ethics content across technical modules. Ethics instruction consists of a wide range of techniques, including stand-alone lectures, group discussions and mini-exercises linked to technical modules. This multi-level approach enables students to develop an understanding both of “responsible and open (data) science citizenship”, and of how such responsibilities are implemented in daily research practices within their home environment. This approach successfully locates ethics within daily data science practice, and allows students to see how small actions build into larger ethical concerns. This emphasises that ethics are not something “removed from daily research” or the remit of data generators/end users, but rather are a vital concern for all data scientists.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference30 articles.
1. Aristotle. (1984). In C. Lord (Ed.), Aristotle’s politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Attwood, T. K., Blackford, S., Brazas, M. D., Davies, A., & Schneider, M. V. (2017). A global perspective on evolving bioinformatics and data science training needs. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 20, 398–404.
3. Baker, M., Beale, A., Hammersley, L., Lloyd, K., Semple, A., & White, K. (2013). Ethical practice in learning through participation: Showcasing and evaluating the PACE ethical practice module. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(3), 195–207.
4. Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. New York: MIT Press.
5. Datta, A., Tschantz, M. C., & Datta, A. (2015). Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2015(1), 92–112.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献