Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Little is known about the long-term and functional prognoses of older adults with pneumonia, which complicates their management. There is a common belief that aspiration is a poor prognostic factor; however, the diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia (AP) lacks consensus criteria and is mainly based on clinical characteristics typical of the frailty syndrome. Therefore, the poor prognosis of AP may also be a result of frailty rather than aspiration. This study investigated the impact of AP and other prognostic factors in older patients with pneumonia.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 75 years and older, admitted with pneumonia in 2021. We divided patients according to their initial diagnosis (AP or non-AP), compared outcomes using Kaplan–Meier curves, and used logistic regression to identify independent prognostic factors.
Results
803 patients were included, with a median age of 84 years and 52.7% were male. 17.3% were initially diagnosed with AP. Mortality was significantly higher in those diagnosed with AP than non-AP during admission (27.6% vs 19.0%, p = 0.024) and at 1 year (64.2% vs 53.1%, p = 0.018), with survival analysis showing a median survival time of 62 days and 274 days in AP and non-AP, respectively (χ2 = 9.2, p = 0.002). However, the initial diagnosis of AP was not an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in multivariable analysis. Old age, frailty and cardio-respiratory comorbidities were the main factors associated with death.
Conclusion
The greater mortality in AP may be a result of increased frailty rather than the diagnosis of aspiration itself. This supports our proposal for a paradigm shift from making predictions based on the potentially futile labelling of AP or non-AP, to considering frailty and overall condition of the patient.
Funder
Japanese Respiratory Society
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Osler W (1892) The principles and practice of medicine, designed for the use of practitioners and students of medicine, 1st edn. D. Appleton and Company, New York
2. Osler W (1898) The principles and practice of medicine, designed for the use of practitioners and students of medicine, 3rd edn. Young J. Pentland, Edinburgh
3. Yoshimatsu Y, Ohtake Y, Ukai M, Miyagami T, Morikawa T, Shimamura Y, Kataoka Y, Hashimoto T (2023) “Diagnose, Treat, and SUPPORT”. Clinical competencies in the management of older adults with aspiration pneumonia: a scoping review. Eur Geriatr Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00898-4
4. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karalus N, Town GI et al (2003) Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax 58(5):377–382
5. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE et al (1997) A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 336(4):243–250
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献