Adverse drug reactions in older adults: a narrative review of the literature

Author:

Zazzara Maria BeatriceORCID,Palmer Katie,Vetrano Davide Liborio,Carfì Angelo,Onder Graziano

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a common and potentially preventable cause of unplanned hospitalization, increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. We aimed to review the classification and occurrence of ADRs in the older population, discuss the role of age as a risk factor, and identify interventions to prevent ADRs. Methods We performed a narrative scoping review of the literature to assess classification, occurrence, factors affecting ADRs, and possible strategies to identify and prevent ADRs. Results Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are often classified as Type A and Type B reactions, based on dose and effect of the drugs and fatality of the reaction. More recently, other approaches have been proposed (i.e. Dose, Time and Susceptibility (DoTS) and EIDOS classifications). The frequency of ADRs varies depending on definitions, characteristics of the studied population, and settings. Their occurrence is often ascribed to commonly used drugs, including anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, digoxin, insulin, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Age-related factors—changes in pharmacokinetics, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and frailty—have been related to ADRs. Different approaches (i.e. medication review, software identifying potentially inappropriate prescription and drug interactions) have been suggested to prevent ADRs and proven to improve the quality of prescribing. However, consistent evidence on their effectiveness is still lacking. Few studies suggest that a comprehensive geriatric assessment, aimed at identifying individual risk factors, patients’ needs, treatment priorities, and strategies for therapy optimization, is key for reducing ADRs. Conclusions Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a relevant health burden. The medical complexity that characterizes older patients requires a holistic approach to reduce the burden of ADRs in this population.

Funder

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference78 articles.

1. WHO Meeting on International Drug Monitoring: the Role of National Centres (1971: Geneva, Switzerland) & World Health Organization. (1972). International drug monitoring : the role of national centres , report of a WHO meeting [held in Geneva from 20 to 25 September 1971]. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/40968

2. Coleman JJ, Pontefract SK (2016) Adverse drug reactions. Clin Med J R Coll Physicians Lond 16(5):481–485

3. Davies EA, O’Mahony MS (2015) Adverse drug reactions in special populations—the elderly. Br J Clin Pharmacol 80(4):796–807

4. Management Sciences for Health and World Health Organization (2007) Drug and Therapeutics Committee Training Course. Submitted to the U.S. Agency for International Development by the Rational Pharmaceutical Management Plus Program. Management Sciences for Health, Arlington

5. Rawlins MD (1981) Today’s treatment clinical pharmacology adverse reactions to drugs. Br Med J 282(21):974–976

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3