Design of a consensus-based geriatric assessment tailored for older chronic kidney disease patients: results of a pragmatic approach

Author:

Voorend Carlijn G. N.ORCID,Joosten Hanneke,Berkhout-Byrne Noeleen C.,Diepenbroek Adry,Franssen Casper F. M.ORCID,Bos Willem Jan W.ORCID,Van Buren MarjolijnORCID,Mooijaart Simon P.ORCID,van Alphen Arjan,Berkhout-Byrne Noeleen,van Breda Fenna,van Buren MarjolijnORCID,Boom Henk,Bos Willem Jan,Diepenbroek Adry,Emmelot-Vonk Marielle,Franssen Casper,Gaillard Carlo A. J. M.,Groeneweg Nel,Hoekstra Bettie,Hommes Nienke,Hoornaar Francoise,Joosten Hanneke,Lagró Joep,Litjens Elisabeth,Molenaar Femke,Mooijaart Simon P.ORCID,Neradova Aegida,Peters Mike,Veldman Wilma,Voorend CarlijnORCID,Westerbos Lidwien,Westerman - van der Wijden Carlijne,Wierdsma Judith,Hemmelder M.,Homan van der Heide J. J.,Prantl K.,Rabelink A. J.,de Rooij S.,Stehouwer C.,

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Unidentified cognitive decline and other geriatric impairments are prevalent in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite guideline recommendation of geriatric evaluation, routine geriatric assessment is not common in these patients. While high burden of vascular disease and existing pre-dialysis care pathways mandate a tailored geriatric assessment, no consensus exists on which instruments are most suitable in this population to identify geriatric impairments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose a geriatric assessment, based on multidisciplinary consensus, to routinely identify major geriatric impairments in older people with advanced CKD. Methods A pragmatic approach was chosen, which included focus groups, literature review, inventory of current practices, an expert consensus meeting, and pilot testing. In preparation of the consensus meeting, we composed a project team and an expert panel (n = 33), drafted selection criteria for the selection of instruments, and assessed potential instruments for the geriatric assessment. Results Selection criteria related to general geriatric domains, clinical relevance, feasibility, and duration of the assessment. The consensus-assessment contains instruments in functional, cognitive, psychological, somatic, patient preferences, nutritional status, and social domains. Administration of (seven) patient questionnaires and (ten) professional-administered instruments, by nurse (practitioners), takes estimated 20 and 40 min, respectively. Results are discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting including at least nephrology and geriatric expertise, informing nephrology treatment decisions, and follow-up interventions among which comprehensive geriatric assessment. Conclusion This first multidisciplinary consensus on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment intent to benefit clinical care and enhance research comparability for older patients with advanced CKD.

Funder

Nierstichting

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3