Abstract
AbstractWe analyzed two morpho-species, Astyanax aeneus and Astyanax caballeroi, coexisting in Lake Catemaco, with ecological differences previously associated with different trophic niches. While A. aeneus is a widely distributed species, A. caballeroi is endemic to Lake Catemaco. Due to the contrasting morphology between these two sympatric species, they were originally assigned to different genera, but little is known about their genetic differentiation. We hypothesized that these two species, which present differentiation in morphology and in trophic niches, co-occur in concomitance with assortative mating and form distinct genetic clusters. We tested this prediction by typing a set of 12 microsatellites in 348 individuals of the two morpho-species, comparing their genetic structure patterns with that of an allopatric population of A. aeneus (i.e., the Maquinas population). Genetic structure analysis, assignment analyses, and estimation of gene flow between the sympatric morpho-species were carried out. Contrary to expectations, there is a lack of genetic differentiation between the A. aeneus and A. caballeroi morpho-species. However, there was a genetic differentiation between Lake Catemaco and Río Maquinas populations of A. aeneus. In addition, we found an asymmetric gene flow pattern, with a larger migration rate from A. aeneus to A. caballeroi than in the other direction. Finally, the allopatric population of A. aeneus showed lower levels of genetic diversity than those reported for both morpho-species in the lacustrine system. Consequently, our results support the notion that these morpho-species are either in an early phase of speciation or represent a single polymorphic species. This model provides relevant information to understanding the presence of polymorphisms under gene flow and their potential impact on the speciation process.
Funder
Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology in Plön Germany
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference77 articles.
1. Arbuthnott D (2017) The ecology of non-ecological diversification: how non-sexual selection affects within-environment diversification via sexual conflict. Evol Ecol Res 18:503–513
2. Barluenga M, Stölting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A (2006) Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439:719–723
3. Barrett RD, Rogers SM, Schluter D (2008) Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback. Science 322:255–257
4. Bay RA, Arnegard ME, Conte GL, Best J, Bedford NL, McCann SR, Dubin ME, Chan YF, Jones FC, Kingsley DM (2017) Genetic coupling of female mate choice with polygenic ecological divergence facilitates stickleback speciation. Curr Biol 27:3344–3349
5. Beerli P, Felsenstein J (1999) Maximum-likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach. Genetics 152:763–773