1. Altintas, Ilkay/Berkley, Chad/Jaeger, Efrat u.a., „Kepler. An extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows“, in: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientific and Statistic Database Management (2004), 21–23.
2. Bauer, Matthias/Zirker, Angelika, „Whipping Boys Explained. Literary Annotation and Digital Humanities“, in: Kenneth M. Price/Ray Siemens (Hg.), Literary Studies in the Digital Age. An Evolving Anthology, New York 2013, https://dlsanthology.mla.hcommons.org/ (letzter Aufruf 3.5.2018).Berthold, Michael R./Cebron, Nicolas/Dill, Fabian u.a., „KNIME. The Konstanz Information Miner“, in: Christine Preisach/Hans Burkhardt/Lars Schmidt-Thieme u.a. (Hg.), Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications, Berlin/Heidelberg 2008, 319–26, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_38, (letzter Aufruf 3.5.2018). Boot, Peter, Mesotext. Digitised Emblems, Modelled Annotations and Humanities Scholarship, Urtrecht 2009.
3. Bradley, John, „Thinking about interpretation. Pliny and scholarship in the humanities“, in: Literary and Linguistic Computing 23 (2008), 263–279.
4. Bradley, John, „Towards a Richer Sense of Digital Annotation. Moving Beyond a ‚Media‘ Orientation of the Annotation of Digital Objects“, in: DHQ 6/2 (2012), http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/6/2/000121/000121.html (letzter Aufruf 26.4.2018).
5. Buzzetti, Dino, „Digital Representation and the Text Model“, in: New Literary History 33 (2002), 61–88.