Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patients suspected to have upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer can be referred directly for investigation; however, at times this may result to inappropriate referrals. This study explores the model of a “one-stop” clinic as an alternative to the direct referral system. The current study aims to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a one-stop UGI clinic and evaluate sensitivity and specificity of “on-the-day” diagnoses.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of case notes of patients seen in one-stop clinic, between January 2017 and January 2019, was conducted. All General Practitioner (GP) referrals were screened by a specialist nurse.
Results
After completion of the post-GP referral screening process, 252 patients (median age 68 years, IQR 58.8–77.3 years; M:F ratio 118:134) were allocated to the one-stop clinic. OGD was not required, contra-indicated or declined in 27 cases (10.7%). The records of three patients could not be found. One patient did not attend. Overall, 221 patients underwent testing and received “on-the-day” diagnoses. Sensitivity was 94% (range 87–100%), and specificity was 92% (88–96%). Ninety-six percent of patients received a diagnosis on the day.
Conclusions
The one-stop clinic was feasible and had good specificity and sensitivity. The finding of 10.7% of cases not being suitable for OGD indicates that a patient/specialist consultation is necessary to prevent misuse of endoscopy appointments. The authors recommend widespread adoption of one-stop clinics in UGI surgery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Hamilton M, Hodgson O, Dai D et al (2018) Waiting times for suspected and diagnosed cancer patients; 2017–2018 Annual Report. NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/06/Cancer-Waiting-Times-Annual-Report-201718.pdf
2. The NHS Longterm Plan, NHS England (2019) https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/nhs-long-term-plan-version-1.2.pdf
3. Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B et al (2015) Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review Br J Cancer 112(Suppl 1):S92-107. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.48
4. Elliss-Brookes L, McPhail S, Ives A et al (2012) Routes to diagnosis for cancer - determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets. Br J Cancer 107(8):1220–1226. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.408
5. Forrest LF, Adams J, White M et al (2014) Factors associated with timeliness of post-primary care referral, diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer: population-based, data-linkage study. Br J Cancer 111(9):1843–1851. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.472