Author:
Kneafsey Simone L.,Russell Shane P.,Power Fiachra R.,Heffernan Eric J.,Hurson Conor
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TTTG) distance is used to assess patellofemoral instability (PFI) and the likelihood of the development of patellofemoral disorders. The current gold standard in the assessment of the TTTG is computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The current image software used for viewing these CT images does not allow for easy assessment of the TTTG.
Aims
This study presents a simple method to measure the TTTG on any image software, utilizing easily available and affordable stationary.
Methods
Four consecutive patients with no known knee pathologies were selected from recent studies at our institution. Their TTTGs were measured using this study’s method and validated using the standard, freely available image analysis software Fiji. Pre-defined anatomical landmarks were located and marked using adhesive pieces of paper. The TTTG was defined as the distance between parallel lines through the apex of the tibial tuberosity and trough of the trochlear groove, where each of these lines is perpendicular to the Dorsal Condylar Line.
Results
The TTTG measured using this study’s method was found to be in agreement with the measurements made using Fiji software.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that the TTTG can be simply and quickly assessed using readily available and affordable stationery, without the need for expensive or complex secondary analysis software. This could allow for the assessment of PFI in the outpatient clinic whilst the patient is present, offering valuable assistance to the orthopaedic surgeon in clinical decision making.
Funder
University College Dublin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference8 articles.
1. Greiwe RM, Saifi C, Ahmad CS, Gardner TR (2010) Anatomy and biomechanics of patellar instability. Oper Tech Sports Med 18:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.otsm.2009.12.014
2. Goutallier D, Bernageau J, Lecudonnec B (1978) The measurement of the tibial tuberosity. Patella groove distanced technique and results (author’s transl). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 64:423–428
3. Schoettle PB, Zanetti M, Seifert B, et al. (2006) The tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. The Knee 13:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2005.06.003
4. Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552649
5. Schöttle PB, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann C, et al. (2005) Trochleaplasty for patellar instability due to trochlear dysplasia: a minimum 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of 19 knees. Acta Orthop 76:693–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041781