Abstract
AbstractStillbirth is over-represented in lower and lower-middle-income countries and understandably this has motivated greater research investment in the development of prediction models. Prediction is particularly challenging for pregnancy outcomes because only part of the population is represented in observational research. Notably, unrecognised pregnancies and miscarriages are typically excluded from the development of prediction models and the consequences of such selection are not well understood. Other methodological challenges in developing stillbirth prediction models are within the control of the researcher. Identifying whether the intended model is for aetiological explanation versus prediction, attainment of a sufficiently large representative sample, and internal and external validation are among such methodological considerations. These considerations are discussed in relation to a recently published study on prediction of stillbirth after 28 weeks of pregnancy for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in India. The predictive ability of this model amounts to the flip of a coin. Future screening based on such a model may be expensive, increase psychological distress among patients and introduce additional iatrogenic perinatal morbidities from over-treatment. Future research should address the methodological considerations described in this article.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Norges Forskningsråd
Curtin University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference7 articles.
1. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths. United Nations Children’s Fund, New York. 2020. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/media/84851/file/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf.
2. Kumar M, Ravi V, Meena D, Chopra K, Nain S, Puri M. Predictive model for late stillbirth among antenatal hypertensive women. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01561-3.
3. Malacova E, Tippaya S, Bailey HD, Chai K, Farrant BM, Gebremedhin AT, Leonard H, Marinovich ML, Nassar N, Phatak A, Raynes-Greenow C, Regan AK, Shand AW, Shepherd CCJ, Srinivasjois R, Tessema GA, Pereira G. Stillbirth risk prediction using machine learning for a large cohort of births from Western Australia, 1980–2015. Nat Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5354.
4. Pereira G, Regan AK, Wong K, Tessema GA. Gestational age as a predictor for subsequent preterm birth in New South Wales Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–7.
5. Pereira E, Tessema G, Gissler M, Regan AK, Pereira G. Re-evaluation of gestational age as a predictor for subsequent preterm birth. Plos one. 2021;16(1):e0245935.