Abstract
AbstractWe investigate drivers of preferences for policies of climate change mitigation using the European Social Survey. We find that the share of individuals who agree on (bonus/malus) potentially balanced budget policies that tax fossil fuels and subsidize renewable energies is much less than those who agree only on subsidizing renewable energies. Low levels of education and income are significantly and negatively correlated with the probability of being part of the group of tax-and-subsidy advocates. We also find evidence of a strong seasonal effect, with a significantly higher share of support for the tax-and-subsidy policy being present when interviews are conducted during the hottest months of the year. We discuss the implications of our findings in terms of politically feasible climate change policies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Finance
Reference42 articles.
1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166.
2. Alló, M., & Loureiro, M. L. (2014). The role of social norms on preferences towards climate change policies: A meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 563–574.
3. Andor, M. A., Schmidt, C. M., & Sommer, S. (2018). Climate change, population ageing and public spending: Evidence on individual preferences. Ecological Economics, 151, 173–183.
4. Aronson, R. B., & Blake, D. B. (2001). Global climate change and the origin of modern benthic communities in Antarctica. American Zoologist, 41(1), 27–39.
5. Atreya, A., Ferreira, S., & Michel-Kerjan, E. (2015). What drives households to buy flood insurance? New evidence from Georgia. Ecological Economics, 117, 153–161.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献