Limitations of the international approach to anti-corruption: a systematic review of South Africa’s compelling case of failing anti-corruption

Author:

Labik Amanquandor Thomas DukeORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the Global South, anti-corruption initiatives continue to fail despite varying commitments to the international anti-corruption agenda. Concurrently, as this study demonstrates, researchers investigating this paradox appear confined within orthodox explanations for failing anti-corruption efforts. Through a systematic review of 58 studies, this paper demonstrates that South Africa’s anti-corruption corpora from 1995 to 2022 fall to this critique. By employing socio-legal theoretical perspectives, the paper elucidates how and why the orthodoxy dominates the corpora and subsequently suggests a more nuanced understanding of the country’s ongoing failure to combat corruption. For example, the paper argues that the intricacies of South Africa’s corruption challenge the perspective that anti-corruption measures fail simply due to widespread rule-breaking. Through the prism of legal pluralism, this paper demonstrates that adherence to rules is indeed prevalent in South Africa, albeit often not aligned with formal state anti-corruption legislation and regulations. Finally, the paper posits innovative approaches to enhance and broaden our comprehension of why anti-corruption efforts fail, especially in the Global South.

Funder

Universitetet i Oslo

University of Oslo

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference120 articles.

1. Alexander, C., Berrisford, S., Nkula-Wenz, L., Ndhlovu, D., Siame, G., Watson, V., & Zinnbauer, D. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of curbing urban corruption and building professional integrity: Experiences of planners in South Africa and Zambia. Habitat International, 122, 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102541

2. April, F. Y., & Sebola, M. (2016). A comparative analysis of corruption in South Africa and China: Evidence from the application of governance theory. Africa Insight, 46(3), 83–100.

3. Atiles, J. (2020). One of the most corrupt places on earth: colonialism, (anti) corruption, and the Puerto Rican Summer of 2019. Special issue. Society and space. https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/one-of-the-most-corrupt-places-on-earth-colonialism-anti-corruption-and-the-puerto-rican-summer-of-2019. Accessed 2023-12-05.

4. Atiles, J. (2023a). Coloniality of anti-corruption: Whiteness, disasters, and the US anti-corruption policies in Puerto Rico. The Sociological Review, 71(6), 1277–1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261231153751

5. Atiles, J. (2023b). On colonial exceptionality, neoliberal coloniality, and legal interruptions. Dialogues in Human Geography, 13(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206221102936

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3