Abstract
AbstractThe dominance ofmodernrationality in knowledge production implies that the distribution of intellectual capital highly depends on the capacity to gather representative data and generate generalizable theses. Furthermore, as research becomes more formalized and dominated by large funding schemes, intellectual capital allocation is increasingly associated with high economic, labor force and institutional power. This phenomenon has consequences at the global level. As the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has documented, there are significant disparities between countries in research capacities, with a marked difference between “core” countries with semi-monopolies over sanctioned knowledge production and “peripheral” states primarily used as data mines. The core–periphery divide in research capacity brings about what decolonial theorists callknowledge abysses: the widespread idea that core countries are the ultimate knowledge producers and thus the legitimate guides in humanity’s road to “progress.” In that context, the democratization of knowledge and the prevention of neo-colonial dynamics require the development of cheaper and more accessible ways of collecting representative data. In this article, we make a call for innovations in methods that can serve to overcome this, and we illustrate possible avenues for achieving sound research without incurring high financial costs by describing and discussing our experiences in researching narco-violence in Colombia and prostitution in Russia with what we call the “taxi method.”
Funder
Antonio Narino University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,General Social Sciences,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference98 articles.
1. Adams, K. A., & Lawrence, E. K. (2019). Research methods, statistics, and applications (2nd ed.). Sage.
2. Adorjan, M., & Ricciardelli, R. (Eds.). (2023). Engaging with ethics in international criminological research. Routledge.
3. Agozino, B. (2003). Counter-colonial criminology. A critique of imperialist reason. Pluto Press.
4. Agozino, B. (2004). Imperialism, crime and criminology: Towards the decolonisation of criminology. Crime Law & Social Change, 41, 343–358.
5. Amin, S. (1997). Capitalism in the age of globalization. The management of contemporary society. Zed Books.