Author:
Monteil Charlotte,Barclay Jenni,Hicks Anna
Abstract
AbstractSustainable post-disaster recovery implies learning from past experience in order to prevent recreating forms of vulnerability. Memory construction supports both the healing process and redevelopment plans. Hence, memory of disaster results from the balance between remembering, forgetting, and absencing elements of the disaster, and can be both a tool and an obstacle to sustainable recovery. We explore here how collective memory is built in a post-disaster context to respond to the needs of this critical period, and how it shapes recovery. This ethnographic study, conducted between 2015 and 2017, explores the recovery processes in Montserrat, a small Caribbean island affected by an extended volcanic crisis from 1995 to 2010. Although this study does not give tangible solutions for disaster risk reduction in a post-disaster context, it highlights potential obstacles for learning from a disaster and how they may be surmounted. We argue that it is crucial to acknowledge evolving collective memory in order to implement effective measures for preserving and sharing a shared understanding of disaster across generations and social groups in a way that supports disaster risk awareness. We also maintain that acknowledging the dilemma faced by authorities and disaster management agencies during a period of conflicting needs may encourage the reconsideration of risk framing, and hence reveal how to improve implementation of disaster risk reduction measures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference39 articles.
1. Bickerstaff, K., and P. Simmons P. 2009. Absencing/presencing risk: Rethinking proximity and the experience of living with major technological hazards. Geoforum 40(5): 864–872.
2. Connerton, P. 2008. Seven types of forgetting. Memory Studies 1(1): 59–71.
3. Connerton, P. 2010. How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Conway, B. 2003. Active remembering, selective forgetting, and collective identity: The case of Bloody Sunday. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 3(4): 305–323.
5. Convery, I., G. Corsane, and P. Davis. 2014. Displaced heritage. Responses to disaster, trauma and loss. Newcastle: Boydell & Brewer.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献