Author:
Zheng Hao,Deng Zhifei,Guo Lanlan,Liu Jifu,Liu Lianyou,Li Tiewei,Zheng Huan,Zheng Tao
Abstract
AbstractLarge earthquakes not only directly damage buildings but also trigger debris flows, which cause secondary damage to buildings, forming a more destructive earthquake-debris flow disaster chain. A quantitative assessment of building vulnerability is essential for damage assessment after a disaster and for pre-disaster prevention. Using mechanical analysis based on pushover, a physical vulnerability assessment model of buildings in the earthquake-debris flow disaster chain is proposed to assess the vulnerability of buildings in Beichuan County, China. Based on the specific sequence of events in the earthquake-debris flow disaster chain, the seismic vulnerability of buildings is 79%, the flow impact and burial vulnerabilities of damaged buildings to debris flow are 92% and 28% respectively, and the holistic vulnerability of buildings under the disaster chain is 57%. By comparing different vulnerability assessment methods, we observed that the physical vulnerability of buildings under the disaster chain process is not equal to the statistical summation of the vulnerabilities to independent hazards, which implies that the structural properties and vulnerability of buildings have changed during the disaster chain process. Our results provide an integrated explanation of building vulnerability, which is essential for understanding building vulnerability in earthquake-debris flow disaster chain and building vulnerability under other disaster chains.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference66 articles.
1. AQSIQ (Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine). 2001. Post-earthquake field works—Part 3: Code for field survey: GB/T 18208.3-2000. Beijing: Standards Press of China (in Chinese).
2. Calvi, G.M., R. Pinho, G. Magenes, J.J. Bommer, L.F. Restrepo-Vélez, and H. Crowley. 2006. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 43(3): 75–104.
3. Chen, Y., J. Hu, and F. Peng. 2018. Seismological challenges in earthquake hazard reductions: Reflections on the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. Science Bulletin 63(17): 1159–1166.
4. Chen, G., K. Huang, M. Zou, Y. Yang, and H. Dong. 2019. A methodology for quantitative vulnerability assessment of coupled multi-hazard in chemical industrial park. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 58: 30–41.
5. CIGEM (China Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring). 2009. An image-based study on typical geological hazards caused by Wenchuan Earthquake. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (in Chinese).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献