Author:
Pickering Christina J.,Dancey Maya,Paik Karen,O’Sullivan Tracey
Abstract
AbstractInformal caregivers are a population currently in the shadows of disaster risk reduction (DRR), and yet essential to the provision of healthcare services. This scoping review explored the literature to understand issues related to informal caregiving and promising practices to support resilience for disasters. Following guidelines for scoping review as outlined by Tricco et al. (2016), relevant publications were identified from five major databases—Medline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Relevant studies referenced informal caregiving and disasters for a variety of population groups including children, people with disabilities or chronic illnesses, and older adults. Studies were excluded if they discussed formal caregiving services (for example, nursing), lacked relevance to disasters, or had insufficient discussion of informal caregiving. Overall, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria and were fully analyzed. Five themes were identified: (1) the need for education and training in DRR; (2) stressors around medication and supply issues; (3) factors affecting the decision-making process in a disaster; (4) barriers leading to disaster-related problems; and (5) factors promoting resilience. Recommended areas of strategic action and knowledge gaps are discussed. Many informal caregivers do not feel adequately prepared for disasters. Given the important role of informal caregivers in healthcare provision, preparedness strategies are essential to support community resilience for those requiring personal care support. By understanding and mobilizing assets to support the resilience of informal caregivers, we also support the resilience of the greater healthcare system and the community, in disaster contexts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference49 articles.
1. Adams, V., S.R. Kaufman, T. van Hattum, and S. Moody. 2011. Aging disaster: Mortality, vulnerability, and long-term recovery among Katrina survivors. Medical Anthropology 30(3): 247–270.
2. Ahmadi, S., H. Khankeh, R. Sahaf, A. Dalvandi, S.A. Hosseini, and F. Alipour. 2018a. How did older adults respond to challenges after an earthquake? Results from a qualitative study in Iran. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 77: 189–195.
3. Ahmadi, S., H. Khankeh, R. Sahaf, A. Dalvandi, and S.A. Hosseini. 2018b. Daily life challenges in an earthquake disaster situation in older adults: A qualitative study in Iran. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 12(4): IC8–12.
4. Allweiss, P., and A. Albright. 2011. Diabetes, disasters and decisions. Diabetes Management 1(4): 369–377.
5. Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1): 19–32.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献