Abstract
AbstractCOVID-19 prompted an abundance of independent and collaborative quick response disaster research (QRDR) initiatives globally. The 2020 federal COVID-19-driven granting opportunities initiated the first official QRDR effort in Canadian history, engaging social scientists to rapidly address the pandemic-related societal influences. This study aims to portray the landscape of this nascent social science QRDR workforce through the first round of federal COVID-19-specific grant recipients. A case study approach was employed to analyze 337 social science projects with 1119 associated researchers, examining the demographic structure of these COVID-19-driven social science researchers and their research projects’ characteristics. Accordingly, the findings are presented through the following two streams: (1) From a researcher perspective, this case study describes researcher typology, geographic location, primary discipline, and educational background, highlighting the diverse characteristics of social sciences researchers, and uneven research development across Canada. (2) From a research project perspective, this case study identifies and synthesizes research project subjects, themes, collaborations, and Canadian distinctions, emphasizing the need for galvanizing cooperation and focusing on uniquely Canadian contexts. The case study illustrates challenges associated with data curation that pose barriers to developing a nuanced understanding of the Canadian social science community COVID-19 research landscape. Consequently, the case study develops three recommendations to improve QRDR development in Canada: promoting information transparency, dissemination, and updates; improving hazards and disaster research workforce evaluation; and enhancing multi-stakeholder cooperation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference71 articles.
1. Allman, D. 2015. Community centrality and social science research. Anthropology & Medicine 22(3): 217–233.
2. Australian Government. n.d. Rapid research information forum 2020. https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/RRIF. Accessed 23 Jan 2022.
3. Baysinger, A., and L.R. Kogan. 2022. Mental health impact of mass depopulation of swine on veterinarians during COVID-19 infrastructure breakdown. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9: Article 842585.
4. Beaven, S., T. Wilson, L. Johnston, D. Johnston, and R. Smith. 2019. Research engagement after disasters: Research coordination before, during, and after the 2011–2012 Canterbury earthquake sequence. New Zealand. Earthquake Spectra 32(2): 713–735.
5. Boisvert, N. 2021. Canada wasn’t prepared for natural disasters in 2021—and next year threatens a repeat. CBC News, 26 December 2021. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-emergency-preparation-1.6285724. Accessed 23 Jan 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献