Author:
Wu Haorui,Heyland Lindsay K.,Yung Mandy,Schneider Maryam
Abstract
AbstractThis systematic review aimed to assess the current knowledge of human–animal interactions (HAIs) in disaster settings and identify areas for future research. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was conducted on three multidisciplinary databases, identifying English-language journal articles published between January 2000 and February 2022 that explored the benefits of and challenges associated with HAI in disasters and emergencies. The review analyzed 94 articles using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The review found a paucity of universal terminology to describe the bidirectional relationship between humans and animals during disasters and a failure to include all animal types in every stage of disaster and emergency management. Additionally, research predominantly focused on the health and well-being benefits of HAI for humans rather than animals. Efforts to promote social and environmental justice for humans and their co-inhabitants should support the welfare of both humans and animals in disaster settings. Four recommendations were developed based on these findings to increase the inclusion of HAI in research, policy, and practice. Limitations of the review included the exclusion of pre-2000 articles and all grey literature, limited research examining different combinations of animal and disaster types, and limited research outside of North America.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference83 articles.
1. Aamodt, N.O. 2018. The potential for disease initiation by inhaled beta-emitting nuclear particles. Medical Hypotheses 116: 124–131.
2. American Veterinary Medical Association. n.d. PETS Act (FAQ). https://www.avma.org/pets-act-faq. Accessed 3 Jan 2023.
3. Anthony, R. 2003. Animals and their moral standing: A philosophical exploration of the relationship between animals and human beings in agriculture. PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
4. Applebaum, J.W., C. Ellison, L. Struckmeyer, B.A. Zsembik, and S.E. McDonald. 2021. The impact of pets on everyday life for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.652610.
5. Applebaum, J.W., C.A. Tomlinson, A. Matijczak, S.E. McDonald, and B.A. Zsembik. 2020. The concerns, difficulties, and stressors of caring for pets during COVID-19: Results from a large survey of U.S. pet owners. Animals 10(10): Article 1882.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献