Abstract
AbstractIn mountainous rural settlements facing the threat of geohazards, local adaptation is a self-organizing process influenced by individual and group behaviors. Encouraging a wide range of local populations to embrace geohazard adaptation strategies emerges as a potent means of mitigating disaster risks. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether neighbors influence individuals’ adaptation decisions, as well as to unravel the mechanisms through which neighborhood effects exert their influence. We employed a spatial Durbin model and a series of robustness checks to confirm the results. The dataset used in this research came from a face-to-face survey involving 516 respondents residing in 32 rural settlements highly susceptible to geohazards. Our empirical results reveal that neighborhood effects are an important determinant of adaptation to geohazards. That is, a farmer’s adaptation decision is influenced by the adaptation choices of his/her neighbors. Furthermore, when neighbors adopt adaptation strategies, the focal individuals may also want to adapt, both because they learn from their neighbors’ choices (social learning) and because they tend to abide by the majority’s choice (social norms). Incorporating neighborhood effects into geohazard adaptation studies offers a new perspective for promoting disaster risk reduction decision making.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Safety Research,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference45 articles.
1. Abrahamse, W., and L. Steg. 2013. Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change 23(6): 1773–1785.
2. Adger, W.N. 2003. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography 79: 387–404.
3. Adjognon, S., and L. Liverpool-Tasie. 2015. Spatial neighborhood effects in agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from Nigeria. In: Proceeding of the international association of agricultural economists (IAAE) 2015 Conference, 9–14 August 2015, Milan, Italy
4. Ajilore, O. 2015. Identifying peer effects using spatial analysis: The role of peers on risky sexual behavior. Review of Economics of the Household 13: 635–652.
5. Bergquist, M., A. Nilsson, and W.P. Schultz. 2019. A meta-analysis of field-experiments using social norms to promote pro-environmental behaviors. Global Environmental Change 59: Article 101941.