Abstract
AbstractWe report on a trial of the neighbourhood thriving framework (NTF), a conceptual framework from psychology and social science for measuring collective subjective social well-being. It combines the notions of feeling good and functioning effectively in a neighbourhood social environment in an indicator set of 15 conceptual dimensions. An online questionnaire was used to measure neighbourhood thriving (NT) among 212 pro-social volunteers involved in revitalising neighbourhoods in the UK city of Stoke-on-Trent between May and October 2018. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 11 factors that made conceptual sense including three social epidemiological pathways to well-being, networks, participation and pro-social behaviours, and four criteria for flourishing societies, autonomous citizenship, safety, cohesive communities and resilience. The 11 sub-scales of NT showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability and preliminary evidence of construct validity. The sub-scales were used tentatively to examine NT among the volunteer sample, which showed the highest sub-scale score for Positive Regard and the lowest score for Celebration. Different levels of NT were observed among the community, with age and income positively associated with higher levels of NT. Further validation work is needed before the NT scales can be used with confidence. Validated scales offer potential benefits including: measuring NT pre- and -post project implementation; establishing which dimensions of NT are, and are not, working well in a community and need strengthening through further initiatives, and establishing which specific groups of people are experiencing lower levels of NT and designing projects that meet their needs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Anderson, J. and Baldwin, C. (2017). ‘Building wellbeing: Neighbourhood flourishing and approaches for participatory Urban Design intervention’, In R. Phillips, C. Wong (eds.), Handbook of community well-being research, International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life, Springer Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0878-2_17.
2. Baldwin, C., & King, R. (2018). Social sustainability, climate resilience and community-based urban development: What about the people? Oxford: Routledge.
3. Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations, 7, 39–58.
4. Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013). Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 26(1), 5–20.
5. Berkman, L. and Glass, T. (2000). Social Integration, Social Networks, Social Support and Health. In Berkman LF and Kawachi I (eds), Social Epidemiology. USA: Oxford University Press, pp.137–173.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献