Abstract
AbstractThe COVID lockdowns were characterised by new forms of governmentality as lives were disrupted and controlled through the vertical transmission of biopolitics by the state. The paper considers how this was experienced by academics in 11 different countries through analysis of diaries written during the first lockdown. The paper asks if communities can offer an alternative to governmentality by looking at three levels: the national, the neighbourhood and the personal. Whilst at a national level the idea of community was instrumentalised to encourage compliance to extraordinary measures, at the local level community compassion through helping neighbours encouraged horizontal connections that could offer a “space” within the dominant logic of governmentality. At the level of personal communities, the digitalisation of social relationships helped to create supportive networks over widely dispersed areas but these were narrowly rather than widely focused, avoiding critical discussion.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference41 articles.
1. Abrams, D., Lalot, F., & Hogg, M. (2021). Intergroup and intragroup dimensions of COVID-19: A social identity perspective on social fragmentation and unity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 201–209.
2. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer. Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
3. Agamben, G. (2021). Where are we now? The epidemic as politics, 2nd edition edn. Eris.
4. Alexander, J. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University Press.
5. Andersen, D., Toubøl, J., Kirdegaard, S., & Carlsen, H. B. (2022). Imposed volunteering: Gender and caring responsibilities during the COVID-19 lockdown. The Sociological Review, 70(1), 39–56.