Author:
Hansen Sylvia,Kaspar Roman,Wagner Michael,Woopen Christiane,Zank Susanne
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The study “Quality of life and well-being of the very old in North Rhine-Westphalia NRW80+” aims at giving a representative picture of the quality of life (QoL) in this population. Conceptually, QoL research has rarely considered the values of older individuals themselves and societal values, and their relevance for successful life conduct. Empirically, comparisons of different age groups over the age of 80 years are rare and hampered by quickly decreasing numbers of individuals in oldest age groups in the population of very old individuals.
Study design and theoretical framework
This paper describes the population of the NRW80+ study and different age groups of very old individuals with respect to biographical background. Furthermore, using the challenges and potentials model of QoL in very old age (CHAPO), key aspects of QoL in late life are discussed and the importance of normative stipulations of what constitutes a successful life conduct are highlighted. In the NRW80+ study older age groups (i.e., 85–89 years, 90+ years) were deliberately overrepresented in the survey sample to enable robust cross-group comparison. Individuals willing to participate in the study but unable to participate in the interview themselves for health reasons were included by means of proxy interviews.
The total sample included 1863 individuals and 176 individuals were represented by proxy interviews. Pronounced differences were observed between age groups 80–84 years (born 1933–1937, N = 1012), 85–89 years (born 1928–1932, N = 573), and 90 years or older (*born before 1927, N = 278) with respect to education, employment and the timing of major life events (e.g., childbirth).
Conclusion
Different life courses and resulting living conditions should be considered when discussing QoL disparities in very old age.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference44 articles.
1. Baltes PB, Baltes MM (1990) Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM (eds) Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences, pp 1–34
2. Baltes PB, Smith J (2003) New frontiers in the future of aging. From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology 49:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1159/000067946
3. Blane D, Higgs P, Hyde M et al (2004) Life course influences on quality of life in early old age. Soc Sci Med 58:2171–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.028
4. Blossfeld H‑P (1989) Kohortendifferenzierung und Karriereprozeß. Eine Längsschnittstudie über die Veränderung der Bildungs- und Berufschancen im Lebenslauf. Campus, Frankfurt am Main
5. Börsch-Supan A, Alcser KH (eds) (2005) The survey of health, aging, and retirement in Europe (SHARE). MEA, Mannheim
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献