Men’s Mating Orientation Does Not Moderate the Accuracy with which they Assess Women’s Mating Orientation from Facial Photographs-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Men’s Mating Orientation Does Not Moderate the Accuracy with which they Assess Women’s Mating Orientation from Facial Photographs

Published:2018-12-18 Issue:1 Volume:5 Page:131-135
ISSN:2198-9885
Container-title:Evolutionary Psychological Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Evolutionary Psychological Science

Author:

DeLecce Tara,Matchock Robert L.,Zeigler-Hill Virgil,Shackelford Todd K.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Psychology

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-018-00184-8/fulltext.html

Reference26 articles.

1. Arnocky, S., Carré, J. M., Bird, B. M., Moreau, B. J., Vaillancourt, T., Ortiz, T., & Marley, N. (2018). The facial width-to-height ratio predicts sex drive, sociosexuality, and intended infidelity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1070-x .

2. Barta, W. D., & Kiene, S. M. (2005). Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: the roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505052440 .

3. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645 .

4. Brase, G. L., & Walker, G. (2004). Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios. Human Nature, 15, 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-004-1020-x .

5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: SAGE.