Improved quantitative parameter estimation for prostate T2 relaxometry using convolutional neural networks
-
Published:2024-07-23
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1352-8661
-
Container-title:Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Magn Reson Mater Phy
Author:
Bolan Patrick J.ORCID, Saunders Sara L., Kay Kendrick, Gross Mitchell, Akcakaya Mehmet, Metzger Gregory J.
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Quantitative parameter mapping conventionally relies on curve fitting techniques to estimate parameters from magnetic resonance image series. This study compares conventional curve fitting techniques to methods using neural networks (NN) for measuring T2 in the prostate.
Materials and methods
Large physics-based synthetic datasets simulating T2 mapping acquisitions were generated for training NNs and for quantitative performance comparisons. Four combinations of different NN architectures and training corpora were implemented and compared with four different curve fitting strategies. All methods were compared quantitatively using synthetic data with known ground truth, and further compared on in vivo test data, with and without noise augmentation, to evaluate feasibility and noise robustness.
Results
In the evaluation on synthetic data, a convolutional neural network (CNN), trained in a supervised fashion using synthetic data generated from naturalistic images, showed the highest overall accuracy and precision amongst the methods. On in vivo data, this best performing method produced low-noise T2 maps and showed the least deterioration with increasing input noise levels.
Discussion
This study showed that a CNN, trained with synthetic data in a supervised manner, may provide superior T2 estimation performance compared to conventional curve fitting, especially in low signal-to-noise regions.
Funder
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Cancer Institute NIH Office of the Director National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Mai J, Abubrig M, Lehmann T, Hilbert T, Weiland E, Grimm MO, Teichgräber U, Franiel T (2019) T2 mapping in prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 54:146–152 2. Klingebiel M, Schimmöller L, Weiland E, Franiel T, Jannusch K, Kirchner J, Hilbert T, Strecker R, Arsov C, Wittsack H-J, Albers P, Antoch G, Ullrich T (2022) Value of T2 mapping MRI for prostate cancer detection and classification. J Magn Reson Imaging 56:413–422 3. Metzger GJ, Kalavagunta C, Spilseth B, Bolan PJ, Li X, Hutter D, Nam JW, Johnson AD, Henriksen JC, Moench L, Konety B, Warlick CA, Schmechel SC, Koopmeiners JS (2016) Detection of prostate cancer: quantitative multiparametric MR imaging models developed using registered correlative histopathology. Radiology 279:805–816 4. Leng E, Spilseth B, Zhang L, Jin J, Koopmeiners JS, Metzger GJ (2018) Development of a measure for evaluating lesion-wise performance of CAD algorithms in the context of mpMRI detection of prostate cancer. Med Phys 45:2076–2088 5. Hepp T, Kalmbach L, Kolb M, Martirosian P, Hilbert T, Thaiss WM, Notohamiprodjo M, Bedke J, Nikolaou K, Stenzl A, Kruck S, Kaufmann S (2022) T2 mapping for the characterization of prostate lesions. World J Urol 40:1455–1461
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Quantitative body magnetic resonance imaging: how to make it work;Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine;2024-09-11
|
|