In vivo quantitative MRI: T1 and T2 measurements of the human brain at 0.064 T
-
Published:2023-05-20
Issue:3
Volume:36
Page:487-498
-
ISSN:1352-8661
-
Container-title:Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Magn Reson Mater Phy
Author:
Jordanova Kalina V.ORCID, Martin Michele N., Ogier Stephen E., Poorman Megan E., Keenan Kathryn E.
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To measure healthy brain $${T}_{1}$$
T
1
and $${T}_{2}$$
T
2
relaxation times at 0.064 T.
Materials and methods
$${T}_{1}$$
T
1
and $${T}_{2}$$
T
2
relaxation times were measured in vivo for 10 healthy volunteers using a 0.064 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system and for 10 test samples on both the MRI and a separate 0.064 T nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) system. In vivo $${T}_{1}$$
T
1
and $${T}_{2}$$
T
2
values are reported for white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for automatic segmentation regions and manual regions of interest (ROIs).
Results
$${T}_{1}$$
T
1
sample measurements on the MRI system were within 10% of the NMR measurement for 9 samples, and one sample was within 11%. Eight $${T}_{2}$$
T
2
sample MRI measurements were within 25% of the NMR measurement, and the two longest $${T}_{2}$$
T
2
samples had more than 25% variation. Automatic segmentations generally resulted in larger $${T}_{1}$$
T
1
and $${T}_{2}$$
T
2
estimates than manual ROIs.
Discussion
$${T}_{1}$$
T
1
and $${T}_{2}$$
T
2
times for brain tissue were measured at 0.064 T. Test samples demonstrated accuracy in WM and GM ranges of values but underestimated long $${T}_{2}$$
T
2
in the CSF range. This work contributes to measuring quantitative MRI properties of the human body at a range of field strengths.
Funder
National Research Council Postdoctoral Fellowship NIST Professional Research Experience Program Hyperfine, Inc.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology,Biophysics
Reference23 articles.
1. Rosenkrantz AB, Mendiratta-Lala M, Bartholmai BJ, Ganeshan D, Abramson RG, Burton KR, Yu J-PJ, Scalzetti EM, Yankeelov TE, Subramaniam RM, Lenchik L (2015) Clinical utility of quantitative imaging. Acad Radiol 22:33–49 2. Keenan KE, Biller JR, Delfino JG, Boss MA, Does MD, Evelhoch JL, Griswold MA, Gunter JL, Hinks RS, Hoffman SW, Kim G, Lattanzi R, Li X, Marinelli L, Metzger GJ, Mukherjee P, Nordstrom RJ, Peskin AP, Perez E, Russek SE, Sahiner B, Serkova N, Shukla-Dave A, Steckner M, Stupic KF, Wilmes LJ, Wu HH, Zhang H, Jackson EF, Sullivan DC (2019) Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:e26–e39 3. Tofts P (2003) Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. Wiley, Chichester 4. Bojorquez JZ, Bricq S, Acquitter C, Brunotte F, Walker PM, Lalande A (2017) What are normal relaxation times of tissues at 3 T? Magn Reson Imaging 35:69–80 5. Marques JP, Simonis FFJ, Webb AG (2019) Low-field MRI: an MR physics perspective. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:1528–1542
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|