Abstract
AbstractWe try to make a long way short by proceeding per exempla from Kenneth Snelson’s sculptures and Richard Buckminster Fuller’s coinage of the term tensegrity to modern tensegrity metamaterials. We document the passage from initial interest in tensegrity frameworks for their visual impact to today’s interest, driven by their peculiar structural performances. In the past seventy years, the early art pieces and roofing structural complexes have been followed by formalization of the principles governing the form-finding property of ‘pure’ tensegrity structures and by engineering hybridization leading to a host of diverse practical applications, such as variable-geometry civil engineering structures, on-earth and in-orbit deployable structures and robots, and finally to recent and promising studies on tensegrity metamaterials and small-scale tensegrity structures.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference164 articles.
1. Snelson, K.D.: Snelson on the tensegrity invention. Int. J. Space Struct. 11, 43–48 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/026635119601-207
2. Emmerich, D.G.: Structures Tendues et Autotendantes. Ecole d’Architecture de Paris la Villette, Paris (1988)
3. Buckminster Fuller, R.: Tensile-Integrity Structures. US Patent 3063521 (1962)
4. Snelson, K.D.: Continuous tension, discontinuous compression structures. US Patent 3169611 (1965)
5. Emmerich, D.G.: Construction de réseaux autotendants. French Patent No. 1377290 (1964)
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献