Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Buddhist non-attachment has been shown to be effective for improving mental health and wellbeing. Non-attachment refers to the ability to engage with phenomena without psychologically clinging to experiences or rejecting them. The present qualitative investigation sought to compare secular and Buddhist-informed counselors’ and psychotherapists’ perceptions of the non-attachment construct, including their views on its relevance for client-therapist practice.
Method
Two data sets were collected. In Sample 1, semi-structured interviews were administered to nine qualified counselors and psychotherapists with limited prior knowledge of non-attachment or related Buddhist principles. In Sample 2, five Buddhist-informed counselors and psychotherapists completed an open questionnaire. Both data sets were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
Results
Analysis of the first sample generated four themes concerning participants’ understanding of non-attachment: (1) misunderstanding non-attachment, (2) who non-attachment might be useful for, (3) potential impact on the therapeutic relationship and (4) the importance of experiential understanding on the part of the therapist. The analysis of Sample 2 generated two themes: (1) considerations for assimilating non-attachment, and (2) positive experiences of applying the construct in client-therapist contexts.
Conclusions
The secular mental health practitioners in Sample 1 recognised the potential utility of non-attachment but harboured some misunderstandings as to its meaning as well as reservations regarding its suitability for all client groups. This was in contrast to Sample 2 participants, who felt that with appropriate therapeutic skill and discernment, non-attachment can be beneficial for a broad range of mental health conditions. Raising awareness of non-attachment amongst secular mental health practitioners is crucial to improving comprehension of the concept and its integration into client-therapist settings.
Preregistration
This study was not preregistered.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Ainsworth, M. (1978). The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 436–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00075828
2. Arch, J., Landy, L., & Brown, K. (2016). Predictors and moderators of biopsychological social stress response following brief self-compassion meditation training. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 69, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.03.009
3. Artson, B. (n.d.). How can I explain non-attachment to my non-Buddhist husband? Retrieved from: https://www.openhorizons.org/how-can-i-explain-non-attachment-to-my-non-buddhist-husband-ask-a-zen-teacher.html
4. Barrows, P., Shonin, E., Sapthiang, S., Griffiths, M. D., Ducasse, D., & Van Gordon, W. (2022a). The development and validation of the ontological addiction scale. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00840-y
5. Barrows, P. D., Richardson, M., Hamlin, I, & Van Gordon, W. (2022b). Nature connectedness, nonattachment and engagement with nature’s beauty predict pro-nature conservation behaviour. Ecopsychology. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2021.0036
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献