Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The 6-item gratitude questionnaire (GQ-6) is a widely used measure reported to be reliable and valid under traditional and Rasch investigations. However, recent investigations were inconsistent regarding the item structure of the GQ-6, with three investigations concluding that item 6 be removed. Previous Rasch analyses also did not produce interval conversion tables, a key benefit of this method which provides a means of improving scale accuracy and aligning the scale with the fundamental principles of measurement.
Methods
A Partial Credit Rasch Model was used to evaluate psychometric properties of the GQ-6 using a combined sample of 663 respondents from the USA (n = 345) and India (n = 318).
Results
Initial analysis showed significant scale dysfunction, with overall and individual item misfit, local dependency, disordered response thresholds, instances of differential item functioning by age and nationality, along with poor reliability. Through the use of recent advances in the Rasch methodology, locally dependent items were combined into two super-items and the best fit to the Rasch model was obtained with evidence of strict unidimensionality, invariance, and strong reliability. Results indicate the GQ-6 is suitable for individual and group assessment, while also permitting the creation of an ordinal-to-interval conversion algorithm which has been provided here.
Conclusions
This study confirmed the robust psychometric properties of the GQ-6 after minor modifications and provides a means for clinicians and researchers to improve the accuracy of this widely used measure in mindfulness research and other relevant studies without modification of its original response format.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Health (social science),Social Psychology
Reference68 articles.
1. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
2. Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291180
3. Andrich, D. A. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814
4. Andrich, D. A., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM 2030. RUMM Laboratory. Perth, Western Australia.
5. Bai, C. F., Cui, N. X., Xu, X., Mi, G. L., Sun, J. W., Shao, D., Li, J., Jiang, Y. Z., Yang, Q. Q., Zhang, X., & Cao, F. L. (2019). Effectiveness of two guided self-administered interventions for psychological distress among women with infertility: A three-armed, randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction, 34(7), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez066
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献