Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group Mindfulness Intervention in a Difficult Asthma Clinic
-
Published:2020-05-15
Issue:7
Volume:11
Page:1734-1746
-
ISSN:1868-8527
-
Container-title:Mindfulness
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Mindfulness
Author:
Ainsworth BenORCID, Patel Aarti, Eyles Caroline, Davies Gail Elaine, Kurukulaaratchy Ramesh, Thomas Mike
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Psychological dysfunction (such as anxiety) is common in people with difficult asthma and is associated with poor outcomes. Asthma guidelines increasingly emphasise the need to recognise and address co-morbidities, and it is plausible that appropriately targeted psychological interventions may be clinically and cost-effective. We hypothesised that mindfulness—facilitating adaptive responses to mental and emotional stress—would be acceptable and feasible for people with difficult asthma and undertook a pilot uncontrolled observational study.
Methods
We offered a 4-week mindfulness intervention (four group sessions with 10–20 min of daily home practice) to adult patients attending difficult asthma clinics. Seventeen patients provided informed consent. Before and 3 months after the intervention, self-report questionnaires assessed asthma control, asthma-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, medication adherence and dysfunctional breathing symptoms. We conducted a focus group and follow-up telephone interviews with patients and collected routine clinic data including lung function.
Results
Three-month follow-up patients had lower self-reported anxiety scores, but there were no significant changes in other self-report measures including asthma control and asthma quality of life—though numerical trends generally indicated improvement. Intervention adherence and study retention varied. Thematic analysis exploring qualitative data found overarching themes highlighting the acceptability of mindfulness treatments, and identified some practical challenges to attending the course.
Conclusions
Patients consenting to the mindfulness intervention found it acceptable. Self-report measures suggest potential for positive impact on their wellbeing. Patients successfully integrated mindfulness with their existing treatment, although practical barriers prevented some from attending the face-to-face group course.
Funder
NIHR School for Primary Care Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Health (social science),Social Psychology
Reference39 articles.
1. Ainsworth, B., Steele, M., Stuart, B., Joseph, J., Miller, S., Morrison, L., et al. (2017). Using an analysis of behavior change to inform effective digital intervention design: How did the PRIMIT website change hand hygiene behavior across 8993 users? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(3), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9866-9. 2. Azim, A., Mistry, H., Freeman, A., Barber, C., Newell, C., Gove, K., et al. (2019). Protocol for the Wessex AsThma CoHort of difficult asthma (WATCH): a pragmatic real-life longitudinal study of difficult asthma in the clinic. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 19(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0862-2. 3. Barton, C. A., McKenzie, D. P., Walters, E. H., Abramson, M. J., & Group, T. V. A. M. S. (2005). Interactions between psychosocial problems and management of asthma: who is at risk of dying? Journal of Asthma, 42(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1081/JAS-200057881. 4. Bender, B. G. (2006). Risk taking, depression, adherence, and symptom control in adolescents and young adults with asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 173(9), 953–957. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200511-1706PP. 5. Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., et al. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|